Minor Edit to Timeline[]
I removed an update on the timeline that came from a restricted area of the IAA's forums. MTTezla 15:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
"Second Unjust War"[]
Someone inserted the name “Second Unjust War” as a suggested name. When that name was deleted, that same someone seems to have referenced themself as the only person to have used it.
Sorry, but the Unjust War was named because it was being fought over the question of the Unjust Path’s place in the cyberverse. The current conflict has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with UJW. Citing it in the name of this conflict is totally inappropriate and misleading.
Unless *substantial* support for that name comes forward in the cyberverse (from sources *other than* General Mazur), I intend to edit out any reference to it that appear. -CirrusOfMalla 21:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
the revolution[]
we are at war with IAA, just look at the wars ingame
The Revolution Kingcjc 21:29, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Actually, the Revolution did declare support for this conflict in this thread: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=21200
It was stated that they would provide whatever support (presumably including military support) should such support be requested by the MHA.
\
72.140.107.55 12:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
That is a sufficient Declaration, they announced their intentions to assist MHA and NATO where necessary. What more do they need to say? WCR 02:03, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
OFS[]
declared on GATO it needs to be added
- No, OFS has said that their war is unrelated to this one. ♦ Vinzent Zeppelin (talk) 20:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Created a separate page for the GATO-OFS War. ♦ Recockulous (talk) 21:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Don't copy my signature lol. <_< ♦ Vinzent Zeppelin (talk) 22:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
awsome
Changing the Name[]
The name of the war sounds pretty lame if you ask me. Couldnt it be changed to the "Unfaithful War" as GATO was supposedly unfaithful to their treaty or the "Retribution War" on the part of NPO and allies issueing justice on GATO for breaking treaty terms? GATO-1V war doesnt seem to cut it. Reahoi 20:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Both of those are one sided, and not actually being used by anybody, GATO-1V War is the most politically correct and you can easily tell which war it is. Wars have names, there not always 'cool'. Rishnokof 21:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
CVF addition[]
Added the link for the Commie Volunteer Force, which was 6 CPCN members who joined GATO in the war due to CPCN dissolving the CPCN-GATO MDP.
Cataduanes, 18:03 CET 06/02/2009.